Over 59103
politifake

Riots Politics


Roderick Scott Neighborhod Watchman -


TAGS: trayvon race riots zimmerman
Rating: 4.5/5

More politifakes by GrouchoMarxist

GrouchoMarxist - June 3, 2014, 7:47 pm
Did the stand your ground troll see this yet?
EmmaRoydes - May 18, 2014, 1:18 pm
Not to be a jerk or anything, but you are incorrect. You can find plenty of examples of the use of non-complex even via google (https://www.google.com/search?q=non-complex&oq=non-complex)
crankyhead - May 18, 2014, 1:03 pm
Emma, one does not say 'non-complex', one says 'simple'. For example: "Speaking English is simple."
fauxnews - May 16, 2014, 3:24 pm
http://www.politifake.org/comments/59376 Come on! You know you want. Good times. :-D
fauxnews - May 16, 2014, 3:23 pm
Uh, huh…sure, herpa derp or what ever you say… Anyways, the rest of us are having fun on the “liberal party poster thread.” :-) If you want to blow off steam, come join the fun, and play! See you there hopefully. Cheers
fauxnews - May 16, 2014, 3:22 pm
/correction...or = of
fauxnews - May 16, 2014, 3:20 pm
Nah, this time around I rather enjoy you just the way you are. Like your own little prison or wackiness.
fauxnews - May 16, 2014, 3:19 pm
Well....apparently not the first two times around, huh? X-D
EmmaRoydes - May 16, 2014, 3:08 pm
might understand where I'm coming from. Of course, it could also be indicative of an onset of alzheimers, but I didn't want to go there.
EmmaRoydes - May 16, 2014, 3:06 pm
and my last point is that I was truly interested in whether or not cranky had been diagnosed yet. If he can't comprehend non-complex statements, it could be an indication of aphasia or agnosia. If you took the time to look at the comment before mine, you
EmmaRoydes - May 16, 2014, 3:00 pm
"generous" lmao, you attacked me, but your attacks were pretty lame. I know you meant to coerce me into saying something that would get me banned, but I may be dumb in your eyes, but I'm not stupid and saw thru you right off the bat.
EmmaRoydes - May 16, 2014, 2:56 pm
From what I saw, the two of you both played the spit, s******, tissue? game. Fortunately for you, moooo went after groucho, not you. But as moooooo stated, I don't know all the details, just what I saw.
fauxnews - May 16, 2014, 1:10 pm
/correction(typo)-I'm pretty fair to everyone here. I've been more than fair with you, very generous in fact...
fauxnews - May 16, 2014, 1:08 pm
hEmmaroydes often are...
fauxnews - May 16, 2014, 1:07 pm
...And I wasn't being rhetorical. Sorry if it came off as a lecture. I was actually seriously asking you that question. I'm very curious why you are SO on the attack with Cranky...seriously. Did he kill your dog or something? Jeeezz...
fauxnews - May 16, 2014, 1:06 pm
Nah, I'll speak when I want to thanx. :-) And your grudge against "Cranky" is unfounded. Groucho, as already know, used to play the "s'pit" and "s'wallow" game. So, I could care less about his feelings. I'm pretty fair to everyone here.More than fair to u
crankyhead - May 16, 2014, 12:48 pm
She sure is sensitive, huh?
EmmaRoydes - May 16, 2014, 12:48 pm
And you came after me as well, so hold your lectures until you can do them from a non hypocritical stance
EmmaRoydes - May 16, 2014, 12:46 pm
That coming from the king of attack comments!? Really fauxnews? Really!? I've seen you bare your teeth at a large number of people on this site. And now you lecture me? Lmao In fact I very recently saw you go after grouchomarxist.
fauxnews - May 16, 2014, 12:05 pm
Do you just wait by the computer all day with unabated breath,waiting for that moment you can attack "Cranky"? What did he do to you again to earn such angry disdain and vengeance?lol..just because he happens to be liberal and proud of it, that's a crime?
crankyhead - May 16, 2014, 12:00 pm
Oh, she's going to pretend to be a doctor today, awesome.
EmmaRoydes - May 16, 2014, 11:55 am
How cute, have you already been diagnosed with either aphasia or agnosia?
crankyhead - May 16, 2014, 11:35 am
Groucho thinks he's liberal... how adorable.
GrouchoMarxist - May 16, 2014, 8:34 am
Everything I know about civil I learned from liberals..
rebeccaolsen - April 20, 2014, 11:00 pm
Ignore him. Don't feed the troll. Groucho is the poster child of uncivil around here.
steve1961 - April 20, 2014, 10:55 pm
I'd hardly say that calling them racists is civil.
GrouchoMarxist - April 20, 2014, 9:47 pm
For some strange reason libs get really pissed when you're more civil than they are..
fauxnews - April 20, 2014, 3:34 pm
Oh,dont worry"Emma"(lol)...we are ALL "friends" here X-D Now,excuse me.Gotta go back to my lovely Easter lunch.Gotta sauté this squash in front of me.Looks like you're already stirring the pot.Guess we're all cooking here!Enjoy this beautiful day.Cheers
foxrecon19d - April 20, 2014, 3:08 pm
Duh...RAMA! Getting back to the poster, I didn't know Roderick Scott sh** a 17 year old white kid. Maybe that's why he changed his name to Dave Chappelle...
steve1961 - April 20, 2014, 3:06 pm
There's a lot about the goings on at this site that I don't understand but if anybody can clean it up, it'd be you, Moo+.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - April 20, 2014, 2:03 pm

You'd have to know the whole backstory to understand and I don't think anyone that's been around here a while would accuse me of "leaning toward Faux". Quite the opposite in fact.
EmmaRoydes - April 20, 2014, 1:07 pm
from the looks of the postings, moooooooooooo, it looks like they are both just a guilty. Little lean towards faux here?
Mooooooooooooooooooo - April 20, 2014, 9:27 am

Faux. Don't take the bait, that just makes it harder for the mods.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - April 20, 2014, 9:18 am

Groucho. Lay off the name calling and the "choking" references. You're not going to get away with messing this place up again.
fauxnews - April 19, 2014, 10:37 pm
*yawn* Keep talking.I always yawn when I'm interested. Here's a fun idea: Let's play horse! I'll be the front end and you just be yourself...
GrouchoMarxist - April 19, 2014, 9:53 pm
In other words anything you post or say here is worth as pile of warm crap.. Don't choke on it loser. Thanks for playing.
fauxnews - February 27, 2014, 12:51 am
Really? Explain to me how that's possible as I'm not from America?DOH! But it sure was fun helping my American friends dissuade conservative voters into staying home and not voting for Mitt.How do you like dem apples?X-D Here,lemme give you another tissue
GrouchoMarxist - February 27, 2014, 12:37 am
An idiot you voted for... Keep up the vacuum
fauxnews - February 26, 2014, 10:48 pm
Oh, about as well as Romney's campaign did. X-D Remind me who won the American Presidential election again? Another box of tissues, mate?
GrouchoMarxist - February 26, 2014, 10:26 pm
How's the Ron Paul campaign these days? Who?
fauxnews - February 24, 2014, 8:04 pm
Boo hoo.Did I hurt your feelings?Still b-urthurt over your last ban?It was only a year long sentence X-D Im sure you enjoy being back.But you're probably not enjoying it as much as I am- watching you lick your wounds.It's VERY satisfying. You're a fun toy
GrouchoMarxist - February 24, 2014, 7:21 pm
Like every suck face lib you bust out knee pads when your dogmas are killed... Keep trying sucknews I'm enjoying this...
fauxnews - February 24, 2014, 10:06 am
Oh, you were asking me? Eww, gross. I think you have me confused with your mother again. You mean to tell me...you did all that for nothing?!?! Tsk! Tsk! Forget to take your meds again? :-/ Forget the tissue. Here...have the whole box! You'll need it. X-D
fauxnews - February 24, 2014, 9:40 am
You dont need to ask me for permission.Do the first.But if you wanna do both,go for it.Only thing I recommend is you get kneepads next time.Those bruises look terrible.And again,TISSUE? You're face is a mess.Wipe it.Or next time,the answer will be NO.X-D
GrouchoMarxist - February 24, 2014, 9:09 am
Do you spit or s******?
fauxnews - February 24, 2014, 3:18 am
Tissue?
GrouchoMarxist - February 24, 2014, 1:31 am
I bet you don't even blink
fauxnews - February 23, 2014, 2:26 am
TRANSLATION(CrotchoMuncher): This post is proof I am retarded.
GrouchoMarxist - February 23, 2014, 1:53 am
Proof that liberals are racists
crankyhead - July 31, 2013, 10:26 am
Possibly worse.
vbattaile - July 31, 2013, 2:00 am
Proof that conservatards are as bad as libtards. Seriously.
vbattaile - July 31, 2013, 12:23 am
Black-white shooting not parallel: http://www.newsday.com/opinion/letters/letter-black-white-shooting-not-parallel-1.5798524
terroraustralis - July 26, 2013, 11:08 pm
44 shares, nice.
OTC - July 22, 2013, 5:34 pm
Remember the riots? I don't even remember the case, did the media not cover this 24/7?
StoneTools - July 20, 2013, 4:53 pm
yeah, I don't either. But Jessie Jackson ... oh, wait ... but al sharpton ... oh wait ... if obama had a son?


PAUL REVERE'S RIDE - Rather than cry "The Socialists are coming" this rallying cry is: "NOVEMBER is coming", "November is coming". Remember to vote out the Obamacrats and big goverment career politicians.




ATTENTION WAL-MART SHOPPERS... -


TAGS: zimmerman trayvon politics riots justice
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by ChadAllen

JGalt - July 13, 2013, 2:49 am
coming soon to a FLorida neighborhood near you....


RACE RIOTS -




" CHANGE YOU CAN BELIEVE IN " - Asking for another Two Trillion Dollar.




Liberal Logic -




Donald Trump & Al Sharpton: Best Friends Forever -




NEW BLACK PANTHER PARTY TWEETS ABOUT ‘STREET MANEUVERS’ SURROUNDING ZIMMERMAN VERDICT: ‘HIGH CHANCE OF REBELLION’ IF ACQUITTED... -


TAGS: obama black panthers riots politics
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by ChadAllen

terroraustralis - July 14, 2013, 12:09 am
its not the new black panther party that people have to worry about, its the wannabe gangbangers like trayvon, who for the last few weeks have been posting **** like "i need a new TV" in response to tweeted threats of rioting if zimmerman is aquitted.
JGalt - July 13, 2013, 11:47 pm
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/07/12/new-black-panther-party-tweets-about-street-maneuvers-surrounding-zimmerman-verdict-high-chance-of-rebellion-if-acquitted/
JGalt - July 13, 2013, 11:46 pm
http://www.mediaite.com/tv/megyn-kelly-guest-reacts-to-zimmerman-family-letter-to-doj-new-black-panther-partys-flyer-is-free-speech/
terroraustralis - July 13, 2013, 11:30 pm
peaceful protesters are doing nothing wrong. but anyone who tries to riot and cause violence because of the zimmerman case, is a f***ing terrorist who deserves a missile through their roof.
terroraustralis - July 13, 2013, 11:28 pm
i have a dream that americans will one day live in a country terrorists will be judged not by the colour of their skin, but by the content of their threats.


CIVIL WAR - Knowone is better at killing "Americans" than "AMERICANS!" Suicide vest wearing Al-Qaeda Amatures..... Leave it to the PROFEFESIONALS!




FREEDOM'S THUNDER -




THE NEW AMERICAN REVOLUTION -




DON'T BE SAD .. - Somewhere In A Poor South American Village,A Shipment Of "Patriots Superbowl XLVII Champions !" Hat And T-shirts Are About To Arrive ..


TAGS: brady patriots super bowl
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by caposwfl

Rudedog - January 21, 2013, 8:58 pm
Awesome, post to motifake.


2012 LONDON OLYMPIC GAMES LOGO HAS BEEN REVISED - to reflect current political conditions.




WISCONSIN PATRIOTS HAVE SPOKEN -




TEA PARTY PATRIOTS -




not all -




Patriot -




TEA WON, SO SUCK IT LIBERALS - TEA PARTY. NOT RACIST, NOT VIOLENT, NOT SILENT ANYMORE. The Tea Party. It's A Constitutional Thing!




R.E.D. FRIDAY -




EQUATION FOR A REVOLUTION -




HOCKEY FANS RIOT - Just imagine what will happen with four more years of Obama!


TAGS: riots over hockey
Rating: 4.2/5

More politifakes by JGalt

JGalt - December 10, 2013, 11:07 pm
Some of us put two and two together and get four, and don't drink the kool aid and don't s****** the daily Kos talking points- we see what politicians did in the past and figure leopards don't usually change their spots...
premiumgrade - December 10, 2013, 10:58 pm
As it turns out, this may be more prophetic than you had intended when you made this in 2011. It’s getting close.


UNDERSTANDING THE TEA PARTY - Dissent is patriotic, when the dissenters are PATRIOTS and the rulers like these, are corrupt, thievin, lyin traitors, who are selling out our Constitution and American way of life


TAGS: dissent is patriotic when the dissenters are patriots
Rating: 4.1/5

More politifakes by JGalt

Renza - March 7, 2013, 1:59 pm
Dissent is patriotic if the reason and objective of it is the greater good of the country one serves. However, this is only valid if one understands what they are dissenting against and the reasons behind the dissent are based in objective reality.


LIBERAL LAUNCHING -




2nd amendment patriots -


TAGS: 2nd amendment patriots or not
Rating: 3.17/5

More politifakes by crankyhead

crankyhead - August 31, 2014, 3:04 am
Do you want to have the conversation, or don't you?
birddseedd - August 31, 2014, 3:03 am
erm. can you send me a link, last email notifica... ya know what..... mike warren. facebook. chuckles. although i think i may try to fall alseep again. talk to ya soon. and if you handle a gun, keep trigger finger straight. straight fingers saves lives
crankyhead - August 31, 2014, 3:01 am
The floor is yours...
birddseedd - August 31, 2014, 2:57 am
also, tell him to get his effing finger off of the trigger.... thats rule number 2.
birddseedd - August 31, 2014, 2:56 am
we still havnt finished the conversation the the other topic if you want to talk. there is much we have not covered
birddseedd - August 31, 2014, 2:56 am
The reason the man in the middle is being irresponsible with his weapon is his finger is on the trigger, look at the two on the outside, their fingers are pointed straight, on the frame, safely away from the trigger.
birddseedd - August 31, 2014, 2:54 am
If you are wanting a longer discussion, im afraid there isnt enough informaiton in this image to say much more. it would make a big difference if they were smiling tho.
crankyhead - August 31, 2014, 2:54 am
...about to surrender their weapons?
crankyhead - August 31, 2014, 2:47 am
So, in that case, how can you testify to their intent and character? Also, what if the guy in the middle is handing the sh**gun to someone standing beside the ph**ographer? He'd be handling it properly then, wouldn't he? Heck, what if all 3 are just...
birddseedd - August 31, 2014, 2:37 am
I also want to point out that the man in the middle, does not know how to handle a firearm and will likely get somebody killed.
birddseedd - August 31, 2014, 2:36 am
Now what you are asking requires context, something in which this picture doesnt have, thus its an impossible question to answer.
crankyhead - August 31, 2014, 2:32 am
bird, are you suggesting that your 'interpretation' of their looks, is the only correct interpretation?
crankyhead - August 31, 2014, 2:31 am
Cyber, what anti gun nuts are you referring to?
Cyberhagen - August 30, 2014, 1:10 pm
All that the anti-gun nuts can see here are the guns. They are pathologically unable to detect or differentiate the context or intent, the aspects of humanity that really count.
birddseedd - August 29, 2014, 5:16 pm
what they are doing is trying to look mean and scary which interpreted by the law means brandishing. If they were doing this in public it is illegal to do.
birddseedd - August 29, 2014, 5:15 pm
body language testifies to intent and character. The problem with these guys is they have the intent on looking like thugs. so when I look at this image yes I have a problem with it the problem that I have is their gross irresponsibility handling firearms
crankyhead - August 29, 2014, 4:17 pm
Live where JG?
crankyhead - August 29, 2014, 4:17 pm
Just out of curiosity, what does the look on their faces have to do with anything?
birddseedd - August 28, 2014, 5:14 pm
ill say the same to this, as i said to the other one like this. these people are tryign to look "gangsta" they are not smiling, in fact they are all but grimising. they are trying to look "mean" yes. that is very different and has nothing to do with race
JGalt - August 27, 2014, 4:20 am
says the man who would not live there.
Curlyrocks - August 26, 2014, 7:59 pm
You's gots to protects yo self.


LIBYA 'KINETIC MILITARY ACTION' LEGAL - Holder Declares Obama’s Libyan 'Kinetic Military Action' is Completely Legal.




ANARCHY - When you riot for the greater good Everything you do is right




TEABAGGERS - NOW YOU KNOW WHY -




Riot? That's not a riot! THIS is a riot! -


TAGS: 2nd amendment americans patriots defenders
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by ScatXXVII

ScatXXVII - February 17, 2017, 1:00 pm
Notice that left wing liberal BlackIsBeautiful Democrats are absolutely terrified FoamyTheSquirrel of this meme. They will not touch it. They Dwydwyyr tell their people to ignore the possibility that Americans behave like Democrats
ScatXXVII - February 16, 2017, 11:52 am
The last time violent Democrats did push good Americans to fight back, slavery in the United States ended.
ScatXXVII - February 16, 2017, 11:49 am
I wouldn't worry about it. Those "racist, bigot, violent, gun-toting, Bible thumping, rednecks" haven' rioted once when Obama was elected. Unlike the "open minded loving, tolerant, compassionate" leftists that are all about burning $#it and breaking stuf
Reality Lord - February 15, 2017, 7:54 pm

powerful poster though. ph**o is strong.
Reality Lord - February 15, 2017, 7:53 pm

let's hope not. i think the only thing the riots did was to further desensatize the main stream liberals and even pulled some to the right. no one comes of looking good when they resort to rioting... so why join them.


Meanwhile, at UC Berkeley -




Americans love Kiss -




When ANTIFA makes the KKK look like patriots -




Three Percenters -




Liberals vs. Conservatives -




Never Let a Crisis Go to Waste -




It's A Sad State Of Affairs -


TAGS: deflate gate sad state of affairs tom brady patriots iran nuclear deal treaty idiocracy
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

Oldsod - May 9, 2015, 2:53 pm
Ironically, the word "h o t" is considered by whatever profanity filter this site uses to be too strong for a family site. I say ironically because...well...did the Google ad on Motifake Plus Side...or Religifake...
Cyberhagen - May 9, 2015, 12:49 pm
Why is the word "s h o t " blocked? WTF?
Cyberhagen - May 9, 2015, 12:48 pm
The world as a whole places far, far too much significance on sports and games, it's not just Americans, not by a long sh**.
mittromney - May 9, 2015, 11:16 am
/I think it has more to do with the I.Q. of your typical American audience. Football, easy. World affairs, not. Make the Iran debacle into a reality tv show with the Kardashians and throw in a few redneck duck hunters, everyone will be hitting that ****/


Baltimore Riots & Looting -




Typical Democrat Leadership -




Baltimore Mayor Stephanie Rawlings-Blake Vetoed Police Body Camera Bill -




Pathetic Presstitute -




Press Conference -




George Soros Built That! -




Baltimore -




Cruz/West 2016 -


TAGS: ted cruz allen west american dream team constitutional conservative patriots heroes freedom liberty constitution tea party dont tread on me
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

Bandit5906 - January 17, 2016, 1:11 am
Can't trust career politicians: Paul Ryan the latest example.


Baltimore Rioters -




Molon Labe -


TAGS: molon labe second amendment gun control come and take it three percenters oath keepers american patriots militia
Rating: 4.71/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

ipaprime - November 9, 2014, 7:22 am
A lot of racist $hit that would embarrass any sane person
Cannabal - November 7, 2014, 11:05 pm
Well, what he say?
CanabalHolocaust - November 7, 2014, 6:21 am
(ADMIN EDIT) This comment has been DELETED in violation of site rules. Keep it civil or you will be banned. This is a warning.
CanabalHolocaust - November 7, 2014, 6:20 am
(ADMIN EDIT) This comment has been DELETED in violation of site rules. Keep it civil or you will be banned. This is a warning.
CanabalHolocaust - November 7, 2014, 6:19 am
(ADMIN EDIT) This comment has been DELETED in violation of site rules. Keep it civil or you will be banned. This is a warning.
CanabalHolocaust - November 7, 2014, 6:18 am
(ADMIN EDIT) This comment has been DELETED in violation of site rules. Keep it civil or you will be banned. This is a warning.


The Motherload Of Liberal Lunacy -




racism is not a one color word -




Be That Guy -




I have a dream -




"Hear ye, hear ye!" -


TAGS: republican flores baltimore riots contextomy
Rating: 4.04/5

More politifakes by fauxnews

rebeccaolsen - May 25, 2015, 10:13 pm
So, that's a No?
calron - May 25, 2015, 10:09 pm
Complex Question again a**uming something that you really cannot know. Just shows how you take you false a**umptions as facts and precede from there.
rebeccaolsen - May 25, 2015, 9:48 pm
So, NOW are you finished with your latest tantrum?. :)
calron - May 25, 2015, 9:21 pm
Cut and paste response fail.
fauxnews - May 17, 2015, 12:08 pm
lol..No.
rebeccaolsen - May 17, 2015, 12:01 pm
Is anyone buying this?
calron - May 16, 2015, 8:08 pm
His statement of one man and one women is voluminous enough to cover single parents, polygamy, that Japanese guy that married his pillow and g** marriage. However context would focus more on the onbe he actually mentioned.
fauxnews - May 12, 2015, 5:21 pm
LMFAO...Yes, I'm "incapable" of buying into the idiotic lies you're peddling in comment#76103. Anything else, mate?
rebeccaolsen - May 12, 2015, 10:55 am
You're welcome. :)
rebeccaolsen - May 12, 2015, 10:54 am
Also, Calvon (a fun dude around here) presented THIS article to 'get-our-back': www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/apr/30/bill-flores-gop-lawmaker-ties-baltimore-riots-to-g/ HEADLINE:"Bill Flores TIES Baltimore Riots to G.AY Marriage, Breakdown of the Fam"
rebeccaolsen - May 12, 2015, 10:32 am
You make this TOO freasy, denier. :) Freasy's Projecting and fake mustache FTL
rebeccaolsen - May 12, 2015, 10:30 am
Flores also has a long history of proudly opposing g.ay marriage.Now,that quote I provided to you AND the unanimous articles out there reporting on his linking-the-riots to-g.ay-marriage is well-documented.Remind us again who's the "pathological liar"? :)
rebeccaolsen - May 12, 2015, 10:24 am
(concluded.) "...There is nothing like TRADITIONAL marriage that does that for a child." And since the media has called out Rep.Flores for tying g.ay marriage to the Baltimore riots, he hasn't challenged this depiction of him.
rebeccaolsen - May 12, 2015, 10:22 am
(cont.)"...because they can have a healthy family and they can raise children in a way that's best for their future, not only socially but psychologically, economically, from a health perspective..."
rebeccaolsen - May 12, 2015, 10:20 am
Your fake mustache fell off, angry boy :) He's lying? Really now. It would lying to say Flores didn't say,"Look at what's going on in Baltimore today,you can see the issues raised there. Healthy marriage are ones between a MAN and a WOMAN..."
freasy - May 12, 2015, 10:01 am
I guess you are incapable of actually reading and comprehending what was said, or you are a pathological liar. He is referring to children who have been abandoned by their fathers and a culture that edifies it.


transformation -




Wealth Disparity -




officially approved violence -




Derp -


TAGS: baltimore riots homophobia bill flores
Rating: 2.6/5

More politifakes by rebeccaolsen

calron - May 25, 2015, 9:12 pm
So you going to pretend to know things that you cannot and them talk about that instead of the subject. Seems like a repeating pattern with a certain group.
MMessEnnBeeCee - May 17, 2015, 9:08 pm
http://a3.img.mobypicture.com/4b7a0410140ce2fbbaaa01aa9f520073_view.jpg
fauxnews - May 17, 2015, 12:20 pm
NP ;-) http://tacitlabs.com/ebay/awaves/nopro.jpg
rebeccaolsen - May 17, 2015, 12:15 pm
Didn't see this until now :) Sorry doll.
fauxnews - May 17, 2015, 12:10 pm
Already one step ahead of you ;-) See #76272
rebeccaolsen - May 17, 2015, 12:02 pm
Is anyone buying this?
fauxnews - May 16, 2015, 10:16 pm
Word of advice: It's not much of a game when we can see your hand ;-) lolololol...It's over, Calvon. We're not buying it. But please feel free to just keep trying to convince yourself. It's your time you are wasting, not ours.lol Cheers
calron - May 16, 2015, 9:00 pm
Opps, I mean rebeccaolsen likelt took the poster as fact without vetting it. And now refuses to admit that he might not have meant what rebeccaolsen says he did.
calron - May 16, 2015, 8:24 pm
I didn't message you.
calron - May 16, 2015, 8:21 pm
Took it as fact and likely didn't vet it.Both his arguments are basically Equivocation and he resorts to personal attacks rather than admit to the big section of the quote that was cut that changes the meaning quite a bit. That was my point you missed.
rebeccaolsen - May 10, 2015, 12:48 pm
#76055 :) http://ajournalofmusicalthings.com/wp-content/uploads/Aw-shucks.jpg
fauxnews - May 10, 2015, 12:39 pm
...or move on to a subject you are more familiar with, like D&D. After experiencing a few of your CC "arguments" it is clear your expertise is "fantasy." ;-) Have a good one, mate. Cheers
fauxnews - May 10, 2015, 12:22 pm
P.S. The truth is, Calvon, we are not sure if YOU UNDERSTAND "basic argumentation".lol..You had your a$s handed to you by Rebecca last week. If I had to go into why, then that really is just sad, mate. You really should learn to quit while you are behind.
fauxnews - May 10, 2015, 12:17 pm
Also, while we're on the subject of your double standard, This - www.politifake.org/propaganda-climate-change-irony-politics-61745.html Wanna guess what Koch brother funded thinktank THIS "non-biased"(lol) picture came from? Rhymes with Fartland Institute
fauxnews - May 10, 2015, 12:13 pm
Heaven forbid. You mean, Rebecca shared a parody picture from a parody website? lol..Also, the dem.website wasn’t the source of that quote. The congressman actually said those words.Much better evidence for it was the article YOU inadvertently posted X-p
rebeccaolsen - May 10, 2015, 11:49 am
Hun, that train left the station a week ago, along with any dignity you had left. Necroposting FTL
calron - May 10, 2015, 2:03 am
So basically you do not understand basic argumentative techniques like applying a premise to another subject to show that it is not sound, and of course, http://www.democraticunderground.com/1017262841
rebeccaolsen - May 6, 2015, 5:32 pm
Speaking from personal experience? :)
MMessEnnBeeCee - May 6, 2015, 4:37 pm
and, clearly, has nothing whatsoever to do with addiction to welfare and subsidized housing
DebtToAmerica - May 6, 2015, 3:11 am
"the baltimore riots are a result of too many black kids growing up without fathers... clearly, marijuana prohibition has had its intended effect!"
rebeccaolsen - May 4, 2015, 2:28 am
So, you're done now? :)
rebeccaolsen - May 4, 2015, 1:56 am
Go troll somewhere else, maybe reddit.com will enjoy your persecution complex.
rebeccaolsen - May 4, 2015, 1:54 am
When you are bringing up "ice-cream" and "murder" and trying to incorporate million dollar words like "strawman" (which you clearly dont understand) in a debate that has nothing to do with ANY of those things,do u really expect anyone to take u seriously?
calron - May 4, 2015, 1:41 am
So plainly by these arguments that you never actually bothered to even acknowledge existed in favor of attacks and strawmanning he did not actually say what you claim he did.
calron - May 4, 2015, 1:40 am
That he talked about what may happen in the future when stating that he was talking about the past. What he actually blamed was "the breakdown of the family" and then stated that redefining marriage (including g** marriage) would make it worse...
calron - May 4, 2015, 1:37 am
You never actually showed me wrong, rather you a**umed two different statements meant the same thing and attacked me and spammed your argument to back itself. As it is you still at blaming murders on ice cream sales because they are linked and ignoring...
rebeccaolsen - May 4, 2015, 1:32 am
so sue me. :)
rebeccaolsen - May 4, 2015, 1:32 am
Not at all. Yes, there are only so many ways I can show you that you are wrong when you did ALL the work for me :) But watching your credibility self-destruct was fascinating in a train wreck sort of way,I couldn't look away.I have a morbid sense of humor
calron - May 4, 2015, 1:24 am
And in the place of reason we have the same old attack lines being spammed. In all your arguing in a circle rather than presenting anything valid.
calron - May 4, 2015, 1:22 am
In all you "argument" shows a lack of the acknowledgement of the concept of fallibility, in which you debate in a big circle without realizing you are using a**uming you are right to prove it so.
rebeccaolsen - May 4, 2015, 1:22 am
The mountain of excuses you're making and your contortionist level of spinning is far more embarrassing than your goof ever was :) Please,dont stop on my accord.It’s quite entertaining watching you do the denier dance.You're practically a whirling dervish
calron - May 4, 2015, 1:19 am
So you still going to a**ume that I didn't do something that I did actually do and then attack me for your own creation rather than what I have actually said. IUt proves to me how biased you really are, so you want some sause on that crow?
calron - May 4, 2015, 1:18 am
Ties like ice cream sales and murder rates means the same to you as blaming murders on ice cream sales. The fact that he spoke of possible future events means he was not speaking of past events, thus couldn't be blaming these riots on g** marriage.
rebeccaolsen - May 4, 2015, 1:17 am
All your spamming and lame red-herrings in the world won't change that, hun. You embarrassed yourself...big time. More salt with your foot?
rebeccaolsen - May 4, 2015, 1:16 am
I can use the word "blames" if you like. It's not like I did something dumb like accidentally posted an article without reading it that actually made the case for my opponent here. Would hate to be that guy right now.
rebeccaolsen - May 4, 2015, 1:14 am
actually says "GOP Rep. Bill Flores ties Baltimore riots to g.ay marriage." According to "basic debate", your evidence made my case for me. Ties, blames. What do I care? Splitting hairs.
calron - May 4, 2015, 1:14 am
Nope, you moved the goal post from, "All I ever said was the Representative blames the riots on g** marriage." to "My argument was/is "Flores ties riots to g.ay marriage". By basic argumentation...
rebeccaolsen - May 4, 2015, 1:13 am
My argument is "Flores blames riots to g.ay marriage". You disagreed, saying "it is more about the rise of single parent households in the black communities," but offered as proof against it an article that doesn't say that at all. The proof you offered
rebeccaolsen - May 4, 2015, 1:11 am
actually says "GOP Rep. Bill Flores ties Baltimore riots to g.ay marriage." According to "basic debate", your evidence made my case for me. Instead of conceding a minor defeat, you are going for the big blow out. Thank you. I like to win big :)
calron - May 4, 2015, 1:11 am
"My argument was/is "Flores ties riots to g.ay marriage"." Nope, you said "All I ever said was the Representative blames the riots on g** marriage." Moved Goal Post.
calron - May 4, 2015, 1:10 am
"Mr. Perkins argued that the government is “the last stop to fix problems,” and that the major issues today can be traced back to “the breakdown of the family, which the redefinition of would only accelerate.”" Tied without causation. QED
rebeccaolsen - May 4, 2015, 1:09 am
My argument was/is "Flores ties riots to g.ay marriage". You disagreed, saying "it is more about the rise of single parent households in the black communities," but offered as proof against it an article that doesn't say that at all. The proof you offered
calron - May 4, 2015, 1:08 am
d*** I suck as spell, he spoke of a possible future events rather that the riots, so you "blame" on what has happened contradicts statement directly.
rebeccaolsen - May 4, 2015, 1:07 am
In the article the rep says“You look at what’s going on in Baltimore today, you know, you see the issues that are raised there.And healthy marriages are the ones between a man and a woman." The article's title itself is"Flores ties riots to g.ay marriage"
calron - May 4, 2015, 1:07 am
Your argumentum ad nauseam is not going to make your failed reasoning any more valid. You didn;t even get the order right as he said about what could happen in the further rather what already happened.
calron - May 4, 2015, 1:05 am
and instead repeatedly attack me without bothering to address what I actually said in reb***al. I have tied ice cream sales to murder and if your argument is valid I must be saying that ice cream sales cause murder. As that is false so is your argument.
rebeccaolsen - May 4, 2015, 1:03 am
The article wouldn't have the headline "GOP Rep. Bill Flores ties Baltimore riots to g.ay marriage" if it was going then refute its own claim. You goofed up and are too proud to admit it
calron - May 4, 2015, 1:02 am
But you claiming a tie means a causal relationship, and my a***ogy shows that no it doesn't. And you have basically failed at even basic debate by saying that me challenging one of the required premises your argument is not a valid...
rebeccaolsen - May 4, 2015, 1:00 am
when the article itself actually said "[The politician] ties the Riots to Ga.y Marriage." And you are too pathologically proud to admit it. So this ridiculous meltdown over it as you try to recover from that :) Please don't stop. It's quite amusing
rebeccaolsen - May 4, 2015, 12:59 am
But we are not speaking about ice-cream sales and murder here. That's a false a***ogy.Any high school debater will tell you that. We are speaking about a politician who tried to tie the riots to g.ay marriage and you offered an article as proof against it
calron - May 4, 2015, 12:54 am
Both ice cream sales and murders increase with temperature. So they are statistically tied together. That doesn't mean that ice cream sales are to blame for murders as a tie itself doesn't mean a causal relation.
calron - May 4, 2015, 12:48 am
Nope, as by the quote from the article you ignored, he tied them without a causal link between the two, which you keep ignoring in favor of of spamming the same line over and over, or argumentum ad nauseam.
calron - May 4, 2015, 12:43 am
One another note, when I see Rep arguments like this, I wonder if they are actually a closet homo***ual covering by being against the parts of themselves that they feel undue shame over.
rebeccaolsen - May 4, 2015, 12:43 am
Again, I said, the congressman blames the riots on g.ay marriage. You offered as proof against that claim an article titled "GOP Rep. Bill Flores ties Baltimore riots to g.ay marriage” So the article is contradicting itself? Then why did you share it hun?
calron - May 4, 2015, 12:42 am
"Mr. Perkins argued that the government is “the last stop to fix problems,” and that the major issues today can be traced back to “the breakdown of the family, which the redefinition of would only accelerate.”" Tied without causation. QED
calron - May 4, 2015, 12:39 am
And while you persist in saying those two statement means the same thing, you ignore the argument that they do not in favor of attacking over using reason, while pretending to know what I think.
calron - May 4, 2015, 12:38 am
Nope, because they are two different statements which shows that you're actually beating a strawman that you refuse to let go of, unless of course you believe that ice cream sales cause murders because science tied them together statistically.
rebeccaolsen - May 4, 2015, 12:37 am
Either you are too embarrassed to admit your goof up or suffer from some disorder that prevents you from seeing that. Either way, I'm just using your words and your article. If you don't like it, you might want to look in the mirror hun. He's to blame :)
rebeccaolsen - May 4, 2015, 12:35 am
All I ever said was the Representative blames the riots on g** marriage. You then posted an article with the headline "GOP Rep. Bill Flores ties Baltimore riots to g.ay marriage" as proof against it, when clearly it is making my point for me.
calron - May 4, 2015, 12:32 am
Science tied murder rates to ice cream sales, but that doesn't mean that one causes the other.
calron - May 4, 2015, 12:31 am
Nope on both counts, still fake mind reading for the fail so you can avoid what I actually say in favor of spamming that attack b***on.
calron - May 4, 2015, 12:29 am
neither the title nor the article say what you wish them to say, not am I "indict it"
rebeccaolsen - May 4, 2015, 12:28 am
I can practically see your red-face from here hun :) Sweating?
calron - May 4, 2015, 12:27 am
So you once again pretend to know what I think and get it wrong to spam that attack b***on. He never once said that the riots where because of g** marriage and neither did I. You seem to be trying to twist the facts to match what you what to be true.
rebeccaolsen - May 4, 2015, 12:27 am
Again, u shared this article. I didn't. Why would you share an article with the title "GOP Rep. Bill Flores ties Baltimore riots to g.ay marriage" if you were just going to indict it? Maybe b/c the truth is you f*cked up and have to spin your way out?
rebeccaolsen - May 4, 2015, 12:24 am
Oh, I read the whole article child :) Now you are just lying to save face. Inside the article itself, Rep. Flores says,"And healthy marriages are the ones between a man and a woman." Flores also has a history speaking out on the subject of g.ay marriage.
calron - May 4, 2015, 12:23 am
The irony is that it sounds like you are describing your usual line of "argumentation" whenever you make an error. Do you want a shovel, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aciTdXoC8J8
calron - May 4, 2015, 12:19 am
Nope, I read the actual thing, you know past the headline. The headline doesn't say what you are saying it does, but you chose to ignore what I actually said on the article to spam the attack b***on yet again.
rebeccaolsen - May 4, 2015, 12:19 am
Pathetic. You are bull****ting now and too committed to stop. I don't give a sh*t WHY he blamed g.ay marriage. All I said is: he did. You acknowledge it. So does the article you posted.Funny to watch you now DENY your own article, denier. BAD SPINNING FTL
rebeccaolsen - May 4, 2015, 12:16 am
Then why did you post it then, sweetie? :) Take a deep breath.
rebeccaolsen - May 4, 2015, 12:15 am
So ts;cr? You said, "It is more about the rise of single parent households in the black communities" yet the article's headline is: "GOP Rep. Bill Flores ties Baltimore riots to g** marriage" So you are indicting your own article you posted?
calron - May 4, 2015, 12:13 am
Isn't funny how you a**ume what I did and spam that attack b***on. :P Try reading past the headline. Now how do you like you crow :)
calron - May 4, 2015, 12:12 am
But if you read the actual article, he is saying the g** marriage would make it worse, rather than blaming it on g** marriage. Thus he is baiting his followers with some red meat, rather than doing what you claim.
rebeccaolsen - May 4, 2015, 12:11 am
Salt with your foot FTW :)
rebeccaolsen - May 4, 2015, 12:11 am
Then there is the article's headline -"GOP Rep. Bill Flores ties Baltimore riots to g** marriage, ‘breakdown of the family’" You said, "Looks like I was right." Between all the bu.tton mashing and your meltdown, forgot to read your article hun? :)
rebeccaolsen - May 4, 2015, 12:09 am
First line of that article you posted - "Texas Republican Rep. Bill Flores suggested Tuesday that the ongoing unrest in Baltimore is largely due to the “breakdown of the family,” which he tied to the legalization of g** MARRIAGE.
calron - May 4, 2015, 12:06 am
Looks like I was right, http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/apr/30/bill-flores-gop-lawmaker-ties-baltimore-riots-to-g/ :P
rebeccaolsen - May 4, 2015, 12:01 am
ts;dc :)
calron - May 3, 2015, 11:53 pm
If there's not more to that quote than you supplied, then I would likely say it is more about the rise of single parent households in the black communities, with some baiting thrown in.


Law and Disorder -




contextomy -


TAGS: baltimore riots marriage selective quotes
Rating: 1/5

More politifakes by calron

rebeccaolsen - May 25, 2015, 8:19 pm
tl;dc ft :)
calron - May 25, 2015, 8:18 pm
Sorry of the facts are not good enough for you, though this is a good example of how you a**ume what I mean in the face of actual evidence and attack that instead of what is actually said, try reading the description next time.
RonaldReagan - May 21, 2015, 2:16 pm
heh heh No. I wasn't buying his malarkey before it was cool.
Zeitguy - May 17, 2015, 9:53 pm
No
fauxnews - May 17, 2015, 12:07 pm
Nope.
rebeccaolsen - May 17, 2015, 11:59 am
Is anyone buying this?
calron - May 16, 2015, 7:48 pm
statement all what they stated all I could see was, so proved yourself knowingly puttering falsehoods to push your own ideas.
calron - May 16, 2015, 7:46 pm
what I meant with clear evidence pointing just the opposite direction and then reaching conclusions based of that false a**umption just because you all missed the point. And for one of you you contradicted your own previous
calron - May 16, 2015, 7:45 pm
I purposely made this a contextomy or the Fallacy of Quoting Out of Context to show how it works. Th title, the description, and the keywords all point to that. But it is nice of you to to jump all over yourselves falsely a**uming
rebeccaolsen - May 11, 2015, 6:47 am
Since you're in the habit of lecturing us on "basic argumentative techniques”[eg#76053] you would expect us to NOT insult your intelligence by accusing you of ignorance. I won't. I fully expected you to lie. Very predictable and poorly played on your part
rebeccaolsen - May 11, 2015, 6:32 am
Im not accusing you of having a hard time grasping this - someone who's so eager to present himself as knowledgable and astute as you do.But I did EXPECT you to be too stubborn to admit you were wrong,just like you're too stubborn to admit you're a denier
rebeccaolsen - May 11, 2015, 6:27 am
over and over again in your meltdown to end all meltdowns.
rebeccaolsen - May 11, 2015, 6:26 am
Yet that’s exactly what YOU DID - you deliberately took the quote out-of-context by editing out information that doesn't serve your narrative. It's not plausible this was unintentional - you bragged about being very knowledgeable about his words last week
rebeccaolsen - May 11, 2015, 6:15 am
If you truly believed “contextomy” is a sin (i.e. intentionally taking words out-of-context to fallaciously DECEIVE others) then why did YOU DECEIVE your audience by withholding from them the quote-in-its-entirety if you think the quote speaks for itself?
DebtToAmerica - May 11, 2015, 1:59 am
and if people dont start to stand up to this ****, eventually we'll all be treated the same way african americans are treated today, because if the police/government can get away with taking away one group's rights, what stops them from taking all rights?
DebtToAmerica - May 11, 2015, 1:51 am
the war on drugs is nothing more than an excuse to wage war on african american communities, we treat these people like f***ing criminals just because their skin is dark, and yet we act like they're in the wrong when they use violence to defend themselves
DebtToAmerica - May 11, 2015, 1:45 am
its not g**s causing the baltimore riots and general unrest among black communities, its the f***ing discrimination and persecution they face at the hands of police.
fauxnews - May 10, 2015, 10:45 pm
Then, of course, there is the 'leading' sentence of the article YOU offered as proof, "[Rep. Flores] suggested Tues.that the ongoing unrest in Baltimore is largely due to the “breakdown of the family,” which he tied to the legalization of g** marriage."
fauxnews - May 10, 2015, 10:42 pm
"Each of us have a mother and a father and there's no way to get around that." Ironically,w/the rest of that quote,an intelligent person would think your poster's making fun of Flores's "contextomy" of taking the riots out of context to rail on g.ays(3/3)
fauxnews - May 10, 2015, 10:36 pm
"...and they can raise children in a way that’s best for their future, not only socially but psychologically, economically, from a health perspective. There is nothing like traditional marriage that does that for a child..."(2/3)
fauxnews - May 10, 2015, 10:35 pm
Here is the rest of the ACTUAL quote, mate. Flores continues,"Look at what is going on in Baltimore today, you see the issues that are raised there. Healthy marriages are the ones between a MAN and a WOMAN because they can have a healthy family..." (1/3)
fauxnews - May 10, 2015, 10:31 pm
Why didn't you USE the full quote, denier? :) You conveniently stopped the quote right at the part where Flores then links the riots to g** marriage. Isn't it "contextomy" to purposely take a quote out of context by leaving out important parts like u did?


PREV PAGE